• Home
  • About Rimag
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Order
Advanced
  • Home
  •  
  • Current Issue

    67
    Issue 67   Vol 20 Winter 1401
    Submit Your Paper List of Reviewers

    Published Issues

    • Vol. 20
      • ✓ Issue 67 - Winter 2022
      • ✓ Issue 66 - Autumn 2023
      • ✓ Issue 65 - Summer 2023
      • ✓ Issue 64 - Spring 2022
    • Vol. 19
      • ✓ Issue 63 - Winter 2021
      • ✓ Issue 62 - Autumn 2021
      • ✓ Issue 61 - Summer 2022
      • ✓ Issue 60 - Spring 2021
    • Vol. 18
      • ✓ Issue 59 - Winter 2020
      • ✓ Issue 58 - Autumn 2020
      • ✓ Issue 57 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 56 - Spring 2020
    • Vol. 17
      • ✓ Issue 55 - Winter 2019
      • ✓ Issue 54 - Autumn 2019
      • ✓ Issue 53 - Summer 2019
      • ✓ Issue 52 - Spring 2020
    • Vol. 14
      • ✓ Issue 43 - Winter 2017
      • ✓ Issue 42 - Autumn 2016
      • ✓ Issue 41 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 40 - Spring 2016
    • Vol. 16
      • ✓ Issue 51 - Winter 2019
      • ✓ Issue 50 - Autumn 2018
      • ✓ Issue 49 - Summer 2018
      • ✓ Issue 48 - Spring 2018
    • Vol. 15
      • ✓ Issue 47 - Winter 2018
      • ✓ Issue 46 - Autumn 2017
      • ✓ Issue 44 - Spring 2017
    • Vol. 13
      • ✓ Issue 38 - Autumn 2015
      • ✓ Issue 37 - Summer 2015
      • ✓ Issue 36 - Spring 2015
    • Vol. 12
      • ✓ Issue 35 - Winter 2015
      • ✓ Issue 34 - Autumn 2014
      • ✓ Issue 33 - Summer 2014
      • ✓ Issue 32 - Spring 2014
    • Vol. 11
      • ✓ Issue 31 - Winter 2014
      • ✓ Issue 30 - Autumn 2013
      • ✓ Issue 29 - Summer 2013
      • ✓ Issue 28 - Spring 2013
    • Vol. 10
      • ✓ Issue 27 - Winter 2013
      • ✓ Issue 26 - Autumn 2012
      • ✓ Issue 25 - Summer 2012
      • ✓ Issue 24 - Spring 2012
    • Vol. 9
      • ✓ Issue 23 - Winter 2012
      • ✓ Issue 22 - Autumn 2011
      • ✓ Issue 21 - Summer 2011
      • ✓ Issue 20 - Spring 2011
    • Vol. 8
      • ✓ Issue 19 - Winter 2011
      • ✓ Issue 18 - Autumn 2010
      • ✓ Issue 17 - Summer 2010
      • ✓ Issue 16 - Spring 2010
    • Vol. 7
      • ✓ Issue 15 - Winter 2010
      • ✓ Issue 14 - Autumn 2009
      • ✓ Issue 13 - Spring 2009
      • ✓ Issue 12 - Spring 2009
      • ✓ Issue 11 - Autumn - Winter 2008
    • Vol. 6
      • ✓ Issue 10 - Spring - Summer 2009
    • Vol. 5
      • ✓ Issue 9 - Autumn - Winter 2007
      • ✓ Issue 8 - Spring - Summer 2007
    • Vol. 4
      • ✓ Issue 7 - Spring - Summer 2006
      • ✓ Issue 6 - Spring - Summer 2006
    • Vol. 3
      • ✓ Issue 5 - Autumn - Winter 2005
      • ✓ Issue 4 - Spring - Summer 2005
    • Vol. 2
      • ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn - Winter 2004
      • ✓ Issue 2 - Spring 2004
    • Vol. 1
      • ✓ Issue 1 - Spring - Summer 2002

    Menu

    • Contact Journal

    Browse

    • •  Current Issue
    • •  By Issue
    • • Author Index
    • •  By Subject
    • •  By Author
    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles  

      • Open Access Article
        • Abstract Page
        • Full-Text

        1 - Analyzing the approach of Meftah Al-Oloum commentators on the relation of 'Badi’' techniques and other categories of Eloquence (7th & 8th Century A.H.)
        ruhollah hadi مصطفی جلیلی تقویان
        20.1001.1.17351030.1398.17.52.5.5
        Many contemporary rhetorical scholars believe that commentaries written on well-known rhetoric books -such as Miftah Al-Oloum, Talkhis Al-Miftah and so on- often involve repetitive and non-creative topics. While this opinion cannot be completely ruled out, careful exa More
        Many contemporary rhetorical scholars believe that commentaries written on well-known rhetoric books -such as Miftah Al-Oloum, Talkhis Al-Miftah and so on- often involve repetitive and non-creative topics. While this opinion cannot be completely ruled out, careful examination shows that commentators have sometimes expressed new issues in their writings. These new issues are important from the perspective of rhetorical history. One of these topics is the link between 'Badi’' and other territories of rhetoric. It is natural for us today to regard the Islamic rhetoric as having three distinct territories, namely 'Ma’ni', 'Bayan' and 'Badi’' ', but in the seventh and eighth centuries this independence was by no means certain. In this paper, the views of Sakaki explainers on 'Badi’' status and its relation to other territories of rhetoric are analyzed. Among these explainers, four classes can be identified, each with a distinct idea. The ideas are as follows: 1. 'Badi’' is part of eloquence. 2. 'Badi’' is part of eloquence and rhetoric. 3. 'Badi’' is part of the science of 'Ma’ni' and 'Bayan'. 4. 'Badi’' is independent and there is no relation to other parts of rhetoric. This paper describes the views of these four classes and analyzes the reasons for this diversity. Manuscript profile
  • Home Page
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Regional Science and Technology Information Center
  • Contact Us

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2017-2023

Home| Login| About Rimag| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]
  • Ricest
  • Login
  • email