• Home
  • About Rimag
  • Contact Us
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Order
Advanced
  • Home
  •  
  • Current Issue

    67
    Issue 67   Vol 20 Winter 1401
    Submit Your Paper List of Reviewers

    Published Issues

    • Vol. 20
      • ✓ Issue 67 - Winter 2022
      • ✓ Issue 66 - Autumn 2023
      • ✓ Issue 65 - Summer 2023
      • ✓ Issue 64 - Spring 2022
    • Vol. 19
      • ✓ Issue 63 - Winter 2021
      • ✓ Issue 62 - Autumn 2021
      • ✓ Issue 61 - Summer 2022
      • ✓ Issue 60 - Spring 2021
    • Vol. 18
      • ✓ Issue 59 - Winter 2020
      • ✓ Issue 58 - Autumn 2020
      • ✓ Issue 57 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 56 - Spring 2020
    • Vol. 17
      • ✓ Issue 55 - Winter 2019
      • ✓ Issue 54 - Autumn 2019
      • ✓ Issue 53 - Summer 2019
      • ✓ Issue 52 - Spring 2020
    • Vol. 14
      • ✓ Issue 43 - Winter 2017
      • ✓ Issue 42 - Autumn 2016
      • ✓ Issue 41 - Summer 2020
      • ✓ Issue 40 - Spring 2016
    • Vol. 16
      • ✓ Issue 51 - Winter 2019
      • ✓ Issue 50 - Autumn 2018
      • ✓ Issue 49 - Summer 2018
      • ✓ Issue 48 - Spring 2018
    • Vol. 15
      • ✓ Issue 47 - Winter 2018
      • ✓ Issue 46 - Autumn 2017
      • ✓ Issue 44 - Spring 2017
    • Vol. 13
      • ✓ Issue 38 - Autumn 2015
      • ✓ Issue 37 - Summer 2015
      • ✓ Issue 36 - Spring 2015
    • Vol. 12
      • ✓ Issue 35 - Winter 2015
      • ✓ Issue 34 - Autumn 2014
      • ✓ Issue 33 - Summer 2014
      • ✓ Issue 32 - Spring 2014
    • Vol. 11
      • ✓ Issue 31 - Winter 2014
      • ✓ Issue 30 - Autumn 2013
      • ✓ Issue 29 - Summer 2013
      • ✓ Issue 28 - Spring 2013
    • Vol. 10
      • ✓ Issue 27 - Winter 2013
      • ✓ Issue 26 - Autumn 2012
      • ✓ Issue 25 - Summer 2012
      • ✓ Issue 24 - Spring 2012
    • Vol. 9
      • ✓ Issue 23 - Winter 2012
      • ✓ Issue 22 - Autumn 2011
      • ✓ Issue 21 - Summer 2011
      • ✓ Issue 20 - Spring 2011
    • Vol. 8
      • ✓ Issue 19 - Winter 2011
      • ✓ Issue 18 - Autumn 2010
      • ✓ Issue 17 - Summer 2010
      • ✓ Issue 16 - Spring 2010
    • Vol. 7
      • ✓ Issue 15 - Winter 2010
      • ✓ Issue 14 - Autumn 2009
      • ✓ Issue 13 - Spring 2009
      • ✓ Issue 12 - Spring 2009
      • ✓ Issue 11 - Autumn - Winter 2008
    • Vol. 6
      • ✓ Issue 10 - Spring - Summer 2009
    • Vol. 5
      • ✓ Issue 9 - Autumn - Winter 2007
      • ✓ Issue 8 - Spring - Summer 2007
    • Vol. 4
      • ✓ Issue 7 - Spring - Summer 2006
      • ✓ Issue 6 - Spring - Summer 2006
    • Vol. 3
      • ✓ Issue 5 - Autumn - Winter 2005
      • ✓ Issue 4 - Spring - Summer 2005
    • Vol. 2
      • ✓ Issue 3 - Autumn - Winter 2004
      • ✓ Issue 2 - Spring 2004
    • Vol. 1
      • ✓ Issue 1 - Spring - Summer 2002

    Menu

    • Contact Journal

    Browse

    • •  Current Issue
    • •  By Issue
    • • Author Index
    • •  By Subject
    • •  By Author
    OpenAccess
    • List of Articles  

      • Open Access Article
        • Abstract Page
        • Full-Text

        1 - A comparative critical analysis Rustam & Shaghad's story (Based on three editions of Shahnameh)
        محمود حسن آبادی لیلا شیرازی
        20.1001.1.17351030.1398.17.52.3.3
        Shahnameh is one of the most valuable works in Iranian culture and has always been of interest to people from all walks of life. Many scribes and copywriters have reproduced it and this has produced many manuscripts.There have been many differences and discrepancies in More
        Shahnameh is one of the most valuable works in Iranian culture and has always been of interest to people from all walks of life. Many scribes and copywriters have reproduced it and this has produced many manuscripts.There have been many differences and discrepancies in the writing of verses, interpretations and words between these manuscripts and, consequently, between the numerous editions of the Shahnameh. Minovy, Nooshin, Davies, Khatibi and Aidenlo have done some research on Shahnameh publications but no independent research has ever been conducted on the differences and discrepancies in those editions of the story of Rostam and Shoghad, which is one of the most important and prominent stories of Shahnameh. Regarding the importance of this issue, the authors of this paper, with the aim of examining the differences among the editions and manuscripts of Shahnameh in the story of ‘Rostam and Shoghad’, have focused on three editions of Shahnameh (I.e. the editions of Khaleghi, Moscow and Mohl) and by applying a comparative-analytical method, they have extracted, classified, analyzed and ultimately attempted to find the sources and causes of these differences and discrepancies.The results of this study indicate that the the main motivations to add verses (eleven verse) by the scribes have been the completion of the structure or characterization of the story, or to add to its semantic and emotional aspect. These additions can be identified mainly by the principle of "authenticity of the brief recording". Although there are various causes in phonetic and lexical interference, the main reason was to simplify the text and bring it to the audience's understanding. In any case, the main reason for all these interferences is the lack of copyright loyalty to the original text. It is worth noting that the results of this essay are restricted to this story and ought not to be generalized to every story of Shahnameh. Manuscript profile
  • Home Page
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Regional Science and Technology Information Center
  • Contact Us

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2017-2023

Home| Login| About Rimag| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]
  • Ricest
  • Login
  • email