Effective Factors in Formation of the Philosophical Formation of the Literary Genre in Romanticism
Subject Areas : Research in Iranian classical literature
Hamid
Forghani
1
Ahmad
2
(Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, University of Qom)
Keywords: Literary schools Literary Genre Classicism Romanticism Genre Theory,
Abstract :
The genre theory or generic criticism is an important issues of literary theory that has been considered on literary studies since Aristotle. This is so considerable that much of the aesthetic principles of the great literary schools have been influenced by it, and the critics studying these movements have devoted part of their studies to the genre theory. Among literary schools, the contrast between the classicism and romanticism is very important in the generic theory. Previous studies addressing this have described classicism’s approach to the literary genres as technical and prescriptive and in contrast the romanticism's approaches as philosophical. However, philosophical components of the genre theory in romanticism have not been thoroughly explained. This research seeks to explain and analyze the components of this philosophical approach and the factors that influence its formation. In other words, what are the components of romanticism’s philosophical approach and what are the factors affecting that? This study shows that the classicism's approach to literary genres was questioned due to Kant's subjective philosophy and Herder's historical relativism and also the social, intellectual, and cultural changes of the Renaissance, such as the industrial revolution and humanism and factors such as historicism, consistent unity theory, attention to the poet's ingenuity in the creation of literary work, individualism, and subjective and phenomenological view led to the formation of a new genre theory in the school of Romanticism.
ارسطو (1382) فن شعر، تألیف و ترجمه عبدالحسین زرین¬کوب، چاپ چهارم، تهران، امیرکبیر.
افلاطون (1380) دوره آثار افلاطون، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، تهران، خوارزمی.
پاینده، حسین (1373) «ریشه‌های تاریخی و اجتماعی رمانتیسم»، فصلنامه ارغنون، سال اول، شماره 2، صص 101-109.
جعفری، مسعود (1378) سیر رمانتیسم در اروپا، تهران، مرکز.
جواری، محمدحسین و محسن آسیب¬پور (1387) «طبقه‌بندی انواع ادبی از منظر نظریه‌پردازان رمانتیک»، دو فصلنامه نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی، دوره اول، شماره 1، صص 33-55.
دوبرو، هدر (1389) ژانر، ترجمه فرزانه طاهری، تهران، مرکز.
زرقانی، سید مهدی و محمودرضا قربان صباغ (1395) نظریه ژانر، تهران، هرمس.
سکرتان، دومنیک (1388) کلاسیسیزم، ترجمه حسن افشار، تهران، مرکز.
کاپلستون، فردریک (1387) تاریخ فلسفه، ترجمه اسماعیل سعادت و منوچهر بزرگمهر، چاپ چهارم، تهران، علمی و فرهنگی.
کاسیرر، ارنست (1370) فلسفه روشنگری، ترجمه یداله موقن، تهران، نیلوفر.
کانت، ایمانوئل (1370) نقد قوه حکم، ترجمه عبدالکریم رشیدیان، تهران، نی.
لونگینوس (1378) در باب شکوه سخن، ترجمه رضا سید حسینی، تهران، فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی.
ولک، رنه (1388) تاریخ نقد جدید، ترجمه سعید ارباب شیرانی، چاپ سوم، تهران، نیلوفر.
هارلند، ریچارد (1393) درآمدی تاریخی بر نظریه ادبی از افلاطون تا بارت، ترجمه گروه مترجمان، تهران، چشمه.
Abrams, m.h (1953) The Mirror and the Lamp, london, Oxford University Press.
Behler, Ernest (1993) German Romantic Literary Theory, Edited by M, Swales, Cambridge University Press.
Cuddon, J.A (1999) Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, london, penguin book.
Duff, David (2009) Romanticism and the uses of genre, new york, oxford university press.
----------------- (2014) Modern Genre Theory, London, routledge.
Hamlin, Cyrus (2008) "The origins of a philosophical genre theory in German romanticis", European romantic review, 3-14.
Hamilton, P (2003) Historisism, london, Routledge.
Izenberg, Gerald (1992) Impossible Individuality, Prinston, New Jersey, Prinston University Press.
Rajan, Tilottama (2008) The Cambridge History of literary criticism, Edited by M, Brown, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Rapaport, Herman (2011) The Literary Theory Toolkit, Chichester, wiley-blackwell.
Reiff, A, S, Bawarshi (2010) Genre, Edited by C, Bazerman, West Lafayette, Parlor press.